I really worry about the future of
Zot...
First observation: no new project based on Zot is created
Second observation: no existing project works on adding Zot support (eg:
https://git.feneas.org/socialhome/socialhome/issues/479 Socialhome gave up)
I see 2 reasons to explain that:
What we need:
With this 2 points, #
zot acceptation should increase. I think some projects will have a look (like #
solid which really fit with #
NomadicIdentities concept)
Without Zot adoption, there will be only 2 active projects by the same small coreteam, and it's going to die (like #
Diaspora* will eventually).
@
Matt Dent (Zap) complains about lack of developers for #
Hubzilla. I was willing to offer my help (because 147 issues is quite high), but when I looked to the code I was frighten. It's a real mess with lots of looseness, bug-prone parts, and spaghetti code. For instance, hardcoded MySQL request in controllers... come on! Even the ckeckstyle is not respected!
By
not using frameworks, Hubzilla present a non-maintainable, hard to evolute, bug-prone code. It would need a real refactor (with a framework I guess). Or another project from scratch when zot is a standard...
I used to be a Hz enthusiast.
I'd like to be one again.
!
Hubzilla Support Forum !
zotlabs.org | Hubzilla Development