Zotlabs|Hubzilla Development

Mario Vavti

Wed, 13 Nov 2019 07:52:46 +0000

If you are enjoying the DEV branch of Hubzilla, be aware that you need to install the SSE Notifications addon to get live notifications back.

!!Zotlabs|Hubzilla Development

Hubzilla 4.6RC Released!

Mario Vavti

Mon, 11 Nov 2019 08:32:49 +0000

If you installed Hubzilla via git and running master branch, you are only a git checkout 4.6RC away from the next Hubzilla release. Make sure to also git checkout 4.6RC the addons if you decide to join the release candidate testing.

You are invited to provide feedback in form of bug reports or merge requests on issues you might find.

You can follow the progress of release candidate testing in this wiki. Please PM me for wiki write-access if desired.

For the changelog please have a look at the git history for now.
A condensed summary will follow with the Hubzilla 4.6 release announcement.

Happy testing!

!Zotlabs|Hubzilla Development !Hubzilla Support Forum

Mtx

Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:04:16 +0000

poVoq

Sat, 30 Nov 2019 16:47:47 +0000

How's the testing going? The progress wiki isn't very helpful :)

Mario Vavti

Sat, 30 Nov 2019 17:37:11 +0000

Testing is going well so far... The fact that the progress wiki is not helpful and that we didn't release yet is due to lack of time.

If nothing crazy pops up, we might be able to release sometime next week :slight_smile:

HTTP 401 from Mastodon

Königsberg, Russia, Fri, 08 Nov 2019 19:11:01 +0000

I spotted that some part of outgoing posts to certain Mastodon hosts are stucks in queue for a long time (and I don't sure if they reaches them at all). In log I see that delivery attemps with z_post_url were finished with HTTP 401.
Does anybody know what this can mean?

Click to open/close

!Zotlabs|Hubzilla Development

show all 12 Comments

Mario Vavti

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 19:27:35 +0000

401 means unauthorized.

Basically you try to post to the shared inbox but they don't let you.

What i find weird, is that the log time says 18:46:53 while the date header time says 06:46:52.

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 19:45:16 +0000

401 means unauthorized

Yes, I know what this usualy means but do not understand why in this case. For example today one post from my Hubzilla channel was successfuly sent to my test Mastodon account but 2nd one created later is still in queue.

What i find weird, is that the log time says 18:46:53 while the date header time says 06:46:52.

Oh, that's can be a reason. I wonder why this happens...

Mario Vavti

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 19:50:44 +0000

Have you seen this issue prior we checked in the date headers (some days ago)?

Mario Vavti

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 19:54:40 +0000

I wonder why this happens...

I know why...
$headers['Date'] = datetime_convert('UTC','UTC', 'now', 'D, d M Y h:i:s \\G\\M\\T');
should be
$headers['Date'] = datetime_convert('UTC','UTC', 'now', 'D, d M Y H:i:s \\G\\M\\T');
This maybe explains an issue with pixelfed aswell...

Giacomino

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 19:56:56 +0000

in my case:
https://mastodon.bida.im/users/Ca_Gi/inbox queued 2019-11-08 11:25:38

but ... it is a post where hundreds of people are responding, I have the feeling that the traffic light is a bit blocked due to the traffic jam, and therefore we also suffer from the traffic light stopped...

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 19:58:15 +0000

@Mario Vavti

Have you seen this issue prior we checked in the date headers (some days ago)?

Yes, one of my contacts complained that she was not receiving my publications in Mastodon.

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 19:59:05 +0000

@Mario Vavti
Bingo!

I know why...
$headers['Date'] = datetime_convert('UTC','UTC', 'now', 'D, d M Y h:i:s \\G\\M\\T');
should be
$headers['Date'] = datetime_convert('UTC','UTC', 'now', 'D, d M Y H:i:s \\G\\M\\T');
This maybe explains an issue with pixelfed aswell...

Giacomino

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 19:59:14 +0000

...when I comment with that person, in a few seconds my answer arrives at destination, but that particular post is really something abnormal..

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 20:02:11 +0000

@Giacomino

https://mastodon.bida.im/users/Ca_Gi/inbox queued 2019-11-08 11:25:38

It seems Mario is absolutely right - all posts sent in the first half of a day goes out and sent in afternoon is not.

Mario Vavti

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 20:16:49 +0000

I just created MR's for core and addons to hopefully fix that.
It does not seem to change the situation with pixelfed though :disappointed:

Mario Vavti

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 20:28:58 +0000

@Max Kostikov just pushed one more MR. Missed one...

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 21:14:08 +0000

And yes, now everything works fine.
Thank you @Mario Vavti !

Mario Vavti

Thu, 07 Nov 2019 19:06:16 +0000

@M. Dent i accidentally pushed a cart related commit to dev instead of creating a merge request:
https://framagit.org/hubzilla/addons/commit/e3f24db65986245d25794a77b0725a63b08cde56

Please review if you find some time... Thanks!

!!Zotlabs|Hubzilla Development

show all 22 Comments

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 03:13:54 +0000 last edited: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 03:12:45 +0000

Looks good but I don't see the widgets/catalogitem.php file. Did I miss it?

Mario Vavti

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 06:10:00 +0000

Oh... I probably forgot to add the files

Mario Vavti

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 07:09:52 +0000

#fixed

Mario Vavti

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 08:56:45 +0000

Btw. if you want to see the catalogitem widget in action you can have a look at my channel page...

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 12:21:42 +0000 last edited: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 12:20:33 +0000

I like it! It has been on my list for a while, just haven't gotten to it so thanks!

hEARt PhoniX

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 18:46:46 +0000 last edited: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 18:51:30 +0000

People, this is cool.
But I have a question. I tried authenticating via remote auth and failed, did not even get an error message. I wanted to test the cart without being connected, but I also could not remote auth with this channel ID.
I cold remote auth on my own test hubs running on current master, though just as I expected.
I could not see any communication in the logs coming from somaton.

Mario Vavti

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 18:50:01 +0000

@h.ear.t i just turned on logging. Can you try to remote auth once more?

hEARt PhoniX

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 18:52:07 +0000

Done

hEARt PhoniX

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 18:54:01 +0000

I am on SSE on this hub.

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 18:54:40 +0000 last edited: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 18:53:30 +0000

Did you have multiple tabs open on Mario's Hub? I noticed that error messages were showing up on the 1st tab I had opened to Mario's site but not any other tabs.

If I recall correctly, I think that the cart requires you to be authenticated. (It's been WAY too long since I've had a chance to get back to that code and look at/ work on it further).

hEARt PhoniX

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 18:56:20 +0000

I used a browser where I am logged into no hub at all.

Mario Vavti

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 19:06:15 +0000

Hm... I see no attempt to magic auth from your side in the logs...
@h.ear.t please visit /authtest at your site and enter my channel url there. Then post the result here.

Mario Vavti

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 19:20:32 +0000

Now i got this:
2019-11-08T19:06:11Z:LOG_INFO:77ee427760:zid.php:370:owt_init: OpenWebAuth: auth success from tobias@hubzilla.rocks
According to the logs, you should be authenticated...

hEARt PhoniX

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 19:36:25 +0000 last edited: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 19:42:22 +0000

Yes I visited your channel. That does work. Not directly calling your channel via it's url on another browser and doing a login via remote auth. Tried that with three unconnected hubs and channels.

hEARt PhoniX

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 19:37:46 +0000

Diagnostic says

Local Setup returns: Array
(
[success] => 1
[url] => https://hub.somaton.com/zot/?f=&auth=tobias%40hubzilla.rocks&sec=76b23fff4dfcc1b8b973bee206328af77a22f0a727d5fb6c9d5f8bd6572dd5a3&dest=https%3A%2F%2Fhub.somaton.com%2Fchannel%2Fmario&version=6.0a
[message] => token 76b23fff4dfcc1b8b973bee206328af77a22f0a727d5fb6c9d5f8bd6572dd5a3 created for channel 2 for url https://hub.somaton.com

)
Remote site responded: Array
(
[success] =>
[message] => signature invalid
)
Authentication Failed!

Mario Vavti

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 19:48:06 +0000 last edited: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 20:19:01 +0000

Hm... It tries to auth against the /zot endpoint. Should be /post since we are not yet in zot6 mode. It seems like mod magic is fetching the wrong hubloc...

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 19:53:04 +0000 last edited: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 19:51:56 +0000

Just FYI - I've remote-auth'd to both of your hubs successfully by clicking on your names in the header of your messages on this thread. (Just as kind of a sanity check).

hEARt PhoniX

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 20:01:24 +0000

Yes, that seemed wrong.

hEARt PhoniX

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 20:19:45 +0000

@M. Dent Yes, that does work ok.
As mentioned:
Open a browser where you are not logged into any hub, go to mario's hub abd try a remote auth. That's what I did.

Mario Vavti

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 20:20:51 +0000 last edited: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 20:21:39 +0000

Not sure if there is a fix for that before we all move to zot6... The hublocs are already ordered by hubloc_connected to choose the older one which is in most situations the one we need...

hEARt PhoniX

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 20:29:11 +0000

That's with the coming version, so ...

Mario Vavti

Fri, 08 Nov 2019 20:35:35 +0000

That's with the coming version, so ...

Possibly in 5.0

Something change? Or am I not remembering something right?

Sat, 02 Nov 2019 18:11:27 +0000

If I post a private message to someone's wall, or use the !! to post to a forum and then visit the channel to which I posted the item, shouldn't *I* be able to see the message?

Did something change in the check of the observer code?

I've sent several "private mention" notes in the last couple of hours - logs show delivery - they show up on my own channel in my own stream - but if I visit the channels that I sent the messages to, I cannot see them.

The first was a message about a Merge Request for a new hook to the Zotlabs|Hubzilla Development forum. I sent a private message to Mario & Max about a separate issue, and I sent a private message to Mike because I ported the hook to Zap also and submitted an MR there.

As a test, I sent a private message between my Hubzilla channel and my channel in my own ZAP instance.

On my ZAP channel, I see my message from my Hubzilla channel, but if I remotely log into my ZAP instance and look at the wall of my ZAP channel, I do not see my message (using my Hubzilla ID logging into ZAP through OWA).

I thought that this used to work as I am expecting it to, but I've had my head buried elsewhere for long enough that I could be misremembering.

Or, maybe I've got just that much screwed up on my instances (though, I don't think so).

Any ideas?

Sat, 02 Nov 2019 18:13:33 +0000

(By private message - I mean I posted to their wall using a private mention @!)

Mon, 04 Nov 2019 13:34:40 +0000

If I post a private message to someone's wall, or use the !! to post to a forum and then visit the channel to which I posted the item, shouldn't *I* be able to see the message?

Answer:  "Maybe" - unfortunately, if you're using any other social network as a guide for what to expect when you visit someone's channel page, you'll probably not see what you expect to see.

This is probably something that needs to be looked at more closely and some consensus sought to figure out what should appear when you visit someone's /channel page.  One thought is to leave the /channel page as it is and create a separate page that includes a wider range of items.

At any rate, here's my own list of what I think would be reasonable to include when I visit someone's /channel page:

1) Public posts written by the /channel owner
2) Private posts written by the /channel owner to which I am a party
3) Private posts written by me to which the /channel owner is a party
4) Public posts where the /channel owner is tagged

From a first read through the code, it appears that (1) is definitely happening.  (3) happens if I post directly to the other person's wall but not if the channel is mentioned or tagged.  So, the only other things that will appear are things that were posted directly to the /channel wall (or otherwise have item_wall set).   I haven't tested all the permutations to determine when/if (2) happens.  And (4) doesn't happen.

I guess this is intended to be the beginning of a discussion about "What do we want on the /channel page?"

How to fix MySQL performance on JOIN queries with sorting

Königsberg, Russia, Fri, 01 Nov 2019 21:37:06 +0000

I spent some time trying to fix query performance with MySQL when building categories list in widget include/contact_widgets.php. I found that its optimizer do not respects table mentions order in JOIN queries when performs ORDER BY so in some cases it dramaticaly increases query run time. But there is a way to fix it using special MySQL specific STRAIGHT_JOIN command.
Here is the hack how it can be fixed in Hubzilla code:
https://framagit.org/kostikov/core/commit/c71818096187dc84e6b44cf43bd178354b4c9de5
Probably this can be useful in other places if someone is having similar problems.

!Zotlabs|Hubzilla Development

show all 10 Comments

Mario Vavti

Sat, 02 Nov 2019 07:22:01 +0000

Yes, the mysql query optimizer certainly does weird things sometimes and bypassing it can be helpful in this situation. The question remains if this is a good long term solution. IIRC friendica uses straight joins in many places (e.g. to build the stream) but their DB structure is quite different to Hubzillas. The rule of thumb says don't use straight joins if performance can be fixed otherwise.

Sat, 02 Nov 2019 08:22:24 +0000

@Mario Vavti Yes, I recalling you wrote about this some time ago. I posted this because I'm not sure if there is a better solution for this request. Any ideas are welcome.

El Dorado

Sat, 02 Nov 2019 09:19:07 +0000

I nearly always use left join and make up for ordering issues by sorting afterward. There may be better ways, but as a general rule this doesn't perform too bad. I didn't realise there were any straight or full joins in the code. There may be reasons for this but mathematically it gets ridiculous.

Sat, 02 Nov 2019 09:29:35 +0000 last edited: Sat, 02 Nov 2019 09:33:12 +0000

@Mike Macgirvin Thanks. I just tested LEFT JOIN instead but unfortunatelly it preforms about the same as JOIN. In compare STRAIGHT_JOIN does this job 4 times faster at least (MySQL 8.0.17 with over 1000 items as result).
Personally I don't like such platform specific hacks but perhaps we need to use it until we will have a better solution.
BTW perhaps we need to redesign "Categories" widget to handle such long lists.

Mario Vavti

Sun, 03 Nov 2019 13:57:44 +0000

@Max Kostikov because i just stumbled upon somewhere else... I could trick the mysql query optimizer to use the right index by just adding a second sort parameter (e.g. item id). See here: https://framagit.org/kostikov/core/blob/dev/Zotlabs/Module/Channel.php#L342

Sun, 03 Nov 2019 14:19:59 +0000

@Mario Vavti Interesting, thanks. I just tested this trick with problematic query from top post but unfortunately it didn't helped. Also it seems that issue only appears in MySQL 8 only. 5.7 performs well with current query code.

Mario Vavti

Sun, 03 Nov 2019 14:29:37 +0000

Have you considered to open a bugreport at mysql? There might be a regression in the query optimizer...

Sun, 03 Nov 2019 14:47:38 +0000

Certainly this is MySQL 8.0.(17?) issue.
Here is EXPLAIN from current query from MySQL 5.7

Click to open/close

root@localhost [hubzilla]> EXPLAIN SELECT DISTINCT term.term FROM term JOIN item ON term.oid = item.id WHERE item.uid = 42 AND term.uid = item.uid AND term.ttype = 3 AND term.otype = 1 AND
item.owner_xchan = 'Whu-c1UTzykRhJSX5z-kdmoVk1E4N1hVnZwebTJbiteGU3TI0SXKXZPib7kiT0S4Ftlq3-ja74bVIEzD_qFIcQ' AND item.item_wall = 1 AND item.verb != 'http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/update' AND item.item_hidden = 0 AND item.item_type = 0 AND item.item_deleted = 0 AND item.item_unpublished = 0 AND item.item_delayed = 0 AND item.item_pending_remove = 0 AND item.item_blocked = 0 AND item.obj_type != 'http://purl.org/zot/activity/file' AND item_private = 0 ORDER BY term.term\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
           id: 1
  select_type: SIMPLE
        table: term
   partitions: NULL
         type: index_merge
possible_keys: oid,otype,ttype,term,uid
          key: uid,ttype,otype
      key_len: 4,1,1
          ref: NULL
         rows: 3232
     filtered: 100.00
        Extra: Using intersect(uid,ttype,otype); Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort
*************************** 2. row ***************************
           id: 1
  select_type: SIMPLE
        table: item
   partitions: NULL
         type: eq_ref
possible_keys: PRIMARY,uid_commented,uid_created,uid_item_unseen,uid_item_type,uid_item_thread_top,uid_item_blocked,uid_item_wall,uid_item_starred,uid_item_retained,uid_item_private,uid_resource_type,owner_xchan,verb,obj_type,item_wall,item_deleted_pending_remove_changed,item_pending_remove_changed,uid_mid
          key: PRIMARY
      key_len: 4
          ref: hubzilla.term.oid
         rows: 1
     filtered: 5.00
        Extra: Using where; Distinct
2 rows in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)

The same from MySQL 8.0

Click to open/close

root@localhost [hubzilla]> EXPLAIN SELECT DISTINCT term.term FROM term JOIN item ON term.oid = item.id WHERE item.uid = 153 AND term.uid = item.uid AND term.ttype = 3 AND term.otype = 1 AND item.owner_xchan = 'Whu-c1UTzykRhJSX5z-kdmoVk1E4N1hVnZwebTJbiteGU3TI0SXKXZPib7kiT0S4Ftlq3-ja74bVIEzD_qFIcQ' AND item.item_wall = 1 AND item.verb != 'http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/update' AND item.item_hidden = 0 AND item.item_type = 0 AND item.item_deleted = 0 AND item.item_unpublished = 0 AND item.item_delayed = 0 AND item.item_pending_remove = 0 AND item.item_blocked
= 0 AND item.obj_type != 'http://purl.org/zot/activity/file' AND item_private = 0 ORDER BY term.term\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
           id: 1
  select_type: SIMPLE
        table: item
   partitions: NULL
         type: index_merge
possible_keys: PRIMARY,uid_commented,uid_created,uid_item_unseen,uid_item_thread_top,uid_item_blocked,uid_item_wall,uid_item_starred,uid_item_retained,uid_item_private,uid_resource_type,owner_xchan,verb,obj_type,item_wall,item_deleted_pending_remove_changed,item_pending_remove_changed,uid_item_type,uid_mid,item_hidden,item_unpublished,item_delayed
          key: uid_item_wall,owner_xchan,uid_item_private,uid_item_type,item_hidden,item_unpublished,item_delayed
      key_len: 5,764,5,8,1,1,1
          ref: NULL
         rows: 570
     filtered: 1.29
        Extra: Using intersect(uid_item_wall,owner_xchan,uid_item_private,uid_item_type,item_hidden,item_unpublished,item_delayed); Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort
*************************** 2. row ***************************
           id: 1
  select_type: SIMPLE
        table: term
   partitions: NULL
         type: ref
possible_keys: oid,otype,ttype,term,uid
          key: oid
      key_len: 4
          ref: hubzilla.item.id
         rows: 3
     filtered: 1.60
        Extra: Using where
2 rows in set, 1 warning (0.02 sec)

And MySQL 8.0 with STRAIGHT_JOIN which looks the same as 5.7 with JOIN

Click to open/close

root@localhost [hubzilla]> EXPLAIN SELECT DISTINCT term.term FROM term STRAIGHT_JOIN item ON term.oid = item.id WHERE item.uid = 153 AND term.uid = item.uid AND term.ttype = 3 AND term.otype = 1 AND item.owner_xchan = 'Whu-c1UTzykRhJSX5z-kdmoVk1E4N1hVnZwebTJbiteGU3TI0SXKXZPib7kiT0S4Ftlq3-ja74bVIEzD_qFIcQ' AND item.item_wall = 1 AND item.verb != 'http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/update' AND item.item_hidden = 0 AND item.item_type = 0 AND item.item_deleted = 0 AND item.item_unpublished = 0 AND item.item_delayed = 0 AND item.item_pending_remove = 0 AND item.item_blocked = 0 AND item.obj_type != 'http://purl.org/zot/activity/file' AND item_private = 0 ORDER BY term.term\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
           id: 1
  select_type: SIMPLE
        table: term
   partitions: NULL
         type: index_merge
possible_keys: oid,otype,ttype,term,uid
          key: uid,ttype,otype
      key_len: 4,1,1
          ref: NULL
         rows: 5957
     filtered: 100.00
        Extra: Using intersect(uid,ttype,otype); Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort
*************************** 2. row ***************************
           id: 1
  select_type: SIMPLE
        table: item
   partitions: NULL
         type: eq_ref
possible_keys: PRIMARY,uid_commented,uid_created,uid_item_unseen,uid_item_thread_top,uid_item_blocked,uid_item_wall,uid_item_starred,uid_item_retained,uid_item_private,uid_resource_type,owner_xchan,verb,obj_type,item_wall,item_deleted_pending_remove_changed,item_pending_remove_changed,uid_item_type,uid_mid,item_hidden,item_unpublished,item_delayed
          key: PRIMARY
      key_len: 4
          ref: hubzilla.term.oid
         rows: 1
     filtered: 5.00
        Extra: Using where; Distinct
2 rows in set, 1 warning (0.01 sec)

Mario Vavti

Sun, 03 Nov 2019 19:22:17 +0000

Hve you tried to rebuild the index stats with optimize table? This might be important if you use InnoDB and had some changes to the table...

Sun, 03 Nov 2019 19:35:49 +0000

@Mario Vavti Yes, this is InnoDB and sure, I did this while investigated.

Zot6 as primary protocol schedule

Mario Vavti

Thu, 31 Oct 2019 11:37:25 +0000

What steps are still needed to switch Hubzilla to zot6?
Is it doable for version 5.0 (possibly 2-3 months from now)?

!!Zotlabs|Hubzilla Development

Fri, 01 Nov 2019 20:03:32 +0000 last edited: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 20:02:42 +0000

I don't have a complete list by any stretch, but I've spent time in both the ZAP and the Hubzilla code now for the last several months. I think it will be work, but I think it should be doable in that time frame.

I think Taking the time to do an audit should be the first step and getting a good list of what needs to be done so those of us who can work on it know what others are doing and can coordinate. And so it doesn't rest on one person's shoulders alone. I really felt bad the first time around that you did so much heavy lifting. (I know Mike did a lot too...)

It might be a good opportunity to use the workflow/issue tracking app in a real world environment and find the pain points (just thinking out loud).

Sub Privacy Groups

RockyIII

Sat, 26 Oct 2019 12:52:02 +0000

Sorted my contacts in few new Privacy Groups - now I wonder if there is a way to filter and search for contacts with defined intersections – something like that would be great to have to define sub Privacy Groups

!Zotlabs|Hubzilla Development
!Hubzilla Support Forum

Tags and links on Mastodon

Santana

Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:18:15 +0000 last edited: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:19:18 +0000

!Hubzilla Support Forum
!Zotlabs|Hubzilla Development

Are there any good news about tags with shared posts from Hubzilla on mastodon?

They are still linking back to Hubzilla instead of showing plain tags:

The "#^" before links is also left in posts:

show all 4 Comments

Santana

Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:29:49 +0000

Screenshot:

Santana

Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:38:25 +0000

@Max Kostikov

Unbelievable fast - thanks 🤗

Santana

Fri, 25 Oct 2019 14:01:48 +0000

@Santana Yes, and this is not related to Hubzilla.

But to fediverse I think :)

Image in Hubzilla not displayed on Misskey

Max

Mon, 21 Oct 2019 14:52:54 +0000

Hello !zotlabs.org | Hubzilla Development

What do you think of the issue https://github.com/syuilo/misskey/issues/5510 ?
Is is a bug with #Misskey? With #Hubzilla? A limitation of #ActivityPub?

Thanks

PS: searching on the web to hopefully find instances where it got sync, it seams to work fin with the Diaspora* protocol. https://www.fessebouc.fr/posts/8573718a-4090-43a4-bc2b-4b8b003725a6

Tue, 22 Oct 2019 02:35:53 +0000 last edited: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 02:35:33 +0000

The image itself is not "from Hubzilla" - the image is actually being served from a 3rd party site (framapic), which may be relevant depending on how Misskey deals with images (I have absolutely NO idea with regard to Misskey).

Looking at the HTML source on page displayed on the Misskey site referenced in the issue report, I don't see any html referencing the image at all - which means somewhere along the line it was stripped out. The fact that D* receives and displays it properly is at least evidence that the issue is not an obvious Hubzilla issue. My guess (and it's only that) is that somewhere along the line, Misskey doesn't like something about the IMG tag and has removed it.

Since I don't know anything about Misskey any guesses would be purely speculation and probably not helpful.

Zotlabs|Hubzilla Development

hubzilla-development@zotlabs.org